Here we go again: Iraq 2. It's Tony Blair’s fault. Having
fooled me into believing that Sadam could deploy bombs with chemical weapons in
45 minutes, now I will not believe Western politicians who declare
that the 'new Sadam', Assad of Syria used chemical weapons against his people.
Now we hear fresh war drums from Washington and Westminster again on the flimsy
caprice of ‘not proven’ evidence. The UN inspectors have gone in to discover if
chemical weapons were used; not to declare who used them.
Her are some questions with ‘a spokesperson’s’ answers.
Q: Why would Assad want to / need to use such weapons?
A: He has no need to use them. As long as Syria retains the support of Russia, China and Iran he cannot be defeated.
Q: How does he lose their support?
A: He uses chemical weapons. So it is not in Syria’s interest to use chemical weapons.
Her are some questions with ‘a spokesperson’s’ answers.
Q: Why would Assad want to / need to use such weapons?
A: He has no need to use them. As long as Syria retains the support of Russia, China and Iran he cannot be defeated.
Q: How does he lose their support?
A: He uses chemical weapons. So it is not in Syria’s interest to use chemical weapons.
Q: How can the opposition forces win?
A: Use the Libyan methodology i.e. harness western military forces (mainly from the air) to bomb an entrenched regime.
Q: So who did use chemical weapons? The opposition?
A: The opposition is fractured and weak. They need help. They can only win with overt support from western military forces. They know that; the West knows that; Israel, the major player in the region knows that.
Q: How can the opposition get that support?
A: If chemical weapons can be found to have been used.
Q: So how were they used?
A: Covert forces with certain elements of the opposition could use state-owned chemical weapons in secret ‘black-ops’ activity. This would create the necessary conditions for military intervention. But would place the blame on Assad!
A: Use the Libyan methodology i.e. harness western military forces (mainly from the air) to bomb an entrenched regime.
Q: So who did use chemical weapons? The opposition?
A: The opposition is fractured and weak. They need help. They can only win with overt support from western military forces. They know that; the West knows that; Israel, the major player in the region knows that.
Q: How can the opposition get that support?
A: If chemical weapons can be found to have been used.
Q: So how were they used?
A: Covert forces with certain elements of the opposition could use state-owned chemical weapons in secret ‘black-ops’ activity. This would create the necessary conditions for military intervention. But would place the blame on Assad!
Q: Who would manage the covert activity?
A: There are several sources with form in’ black-ops’ dirty
warfare in this region. There are the obvious international actors but at the
same time there are sources within Syria that could be hired to create the
necessary conditions for intervention. What we are seeing in Syria is classic
covert activity ‘dirty warfare’ in order that the west can produce regime
change in Syria. Parliament will once again be asked to walk through the war
lobby and operate against the interests of the people who voted for
them in a damned display of dirty democracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment